World's first medical networking and resource portal

News & Highlights
Please make use of the search function to browse preferred content
Medical News & Updates
Sep 06
Nigerian woman walks after 11 years after surgery in India
A 65-year old Nigerian woman suffering severe rheumatoid arthritis, who hadn't walked for 11 years, is now walking again. She was treated in India and believe it or not, she will be going home with five metallic implants. It's like a second life for 65-year old Margaret to be able to stand up and walk on her own after being bedridden for 11 years.

"My fingers were so swollen, I could not even brush my teeth, my grand daughter used to help me. I couldn't stand up, couldn't walk. I couldn't go to the church. My daughter used to help me wash. My cook would feed me. And I was in great pain. I used to cry day and night," Margaret said.

A year ago, she flew down to India with her son where doctors at a private hospital in the capital performed three separate types of surgeries on her.

First, both her knee joints, which were almost worn down due to rheumatoid arthritis, had to be replaced with metallic implants. Next, she had spinal surgery to help ease the pain and correct the stoop in her back, so she could stand again. And finally, both her hip joints needed to be replaced with metallic implants.

In total, Margaret now has five metallic implants in her body.

Orthopedic surgeon Dr Yash Gulati said, "She has metal joints in her hips, metal joints in her knees, metal screws in her spine, metal all over. She was over weight, had soft bones but despite all challenges, she did well."

The surgeries cost about Rs 14 lakh in total, but Margaret has no complaints.

She said, "I was dead then, I am alive now. I want to go back to the church and I want to run my business again, be with my sons and daughters, play with my grandchildren."

After regular physiotherapy for the next few weeks, Margaret would be able to fly home to a new life.

Sep 05
Indians' lungs unhealthiest
Indians have the unhealthiest lungs in the world. This, doctors believe, can be directly attributed to the poor quality air that Indians are breathing.

Dr Salim Yusuf, professor of medicine at the McMaster University, arrived on the conclusion after conducting a year-long ground breaking study across seven centres in India while looking at lung functions of people living in seventeen countries. Lungs of Indians are 30 per less effective than those of Europeans who have been found enjoying the best health across all groups.

Dr Yusuf has blamed deteriorating outdoor and indoor air quality in India for this sorry state of affairs. New evidences bring to light that air pollution levels are not only causing respiratory disorders. But in recent years, medical fraternity has come around to believe that cardiac cases, cancer, mutagenic effects, diabetes, stroke and hyper-tension are directly linked to environmental and especially air pollution.
The study was presented at the American Thoracic Society meet 2011 held at Denver and though the abstract admits that genes and nutrition patterns vary in different ethnic groups, for the first time a direct co-relation has been drawn between poor environment and declining lung capacity.

Pune-based Dr Sundeep Salvi of the Chest Rese-arch Foundation (CRF), agrees that studies conducted by his own institute show that indoor air is probably more polluted than air being breathed out of doors. "We conducted an experiment which showed that the use of one mosquito coil for eight hours is equivalent to the smoking of 100 cigarettes. Experiments show that the smoke of agarbattis contains black tar," said Dr Salvi.

While the studies confirm that child asthma cases have doubled in the last five years, a separate study conducted by CRF on 16,000 children has shown a direct co-relation between asthma and truck traffic density.

Sep 05
Abortion increases risk of mental health problems, new research finds
Women who have abortions are at risk of severe mental health problems, new research has found.

The study showed that those who undergo abortion face nearly double the risk of mental health difficulties compared with others and that one in ten of all mental health problems was a result of an abortion.

The findings come as Tory MP Nadine Dorries, backed by Labour's Frank Field, has put down an amendment to a Health Bill which requires women seeking abortion to see an independent counsellor first.

Currently organisations which provide abortions offer counselling, but critics say the advice given can often be biased.

The latest research was carried out by American academic Priscilla Coleman and published in the British Journal of Psychiatry.

It adds to previous findings made public by the journal three years ago which first questioned the assumption of abortion campaigners that terminating a pregnancy reduces rather than increases the health risks to women.

Professor Coleman's study was based on an analysis of 22 separate projects which analysed the experiences of a total of 877,000 women, of whom 163,831 had had an abortion.

It said: "Results indicate quite consistently that abortion is associated with moderate to highly increased risks of psychological problems subsequent to the procedure.

"Overall, the results revealed that women who had undergone an abortion experienced an 81 per cent increased risk of mental health problems, and nearly 10 per cent of the incidence of mental health problems were shown to be directly attributable to abortion."

The study said that abortion was linked with a 34 per cent greater chance of anxiety disorders, and 37 per cent higher possibility of depression, a more than double risk of alcohol abuse - 110 per cent - a three times greater risk of cannabis use - at 220 per cent - and 155 per cent greater risk of trying to commit suicide.

Professor Coleman said her research was intended "to produce an unbiased analysis of the best available evidence addressing abortion as one risk factor among many others that may increase the likelihood of mental health problems".

She added: "There are in fact some real risks associated with abortion that should be shared with women as they are counselled prior to an abortion."

Sep 05
SMALL FACTS
Better can sometimes be just not good enough. A recent study on global neonatal mortality from 1990 to 2009, spearheaded by the World Health Organization, shows that in India there has been a 33 per cent drop in deaths of babies of not more than three weeks old. Even then, nine lakh babies, less than a month old, died in India in 2009, and this is the highest figure in the world. The context will indicate the enormity of this failure for a nation supposedly growing into a powerhouse. In the last 20 years, the global neonatal mortality rate has declined, but more than half of all such deaths occurred in India, Nigeria, Pakistan, China and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Africa as a continent is not doing well in this regard anyway; in some places, newborn babies are dying in greater numbers than before. But comparisons with African countries cannot provide excuses. The report shows that four per cent of all babies born live in India in the last 20 years died within a month.

Experts have recommended three simple ways to reduce neonatal deaths by one-third immediately - improved hygiene at birth, breastfeeding and keeping the baby warm. In India, access to basic health is still poor in vast rural tracts. Added to this, drinkable water may be scarce, nutrition poor - especially for women, deliveries at home quite common, and education regarding the proper protection of mother and child pathetically lacking. Government intervention in health services delivery has simply not been aggressive enough. Then there is the dominant mindset to contend with. Indian society has traditionally been callous to both women and children, and the neonatal mortality rate, just like the imbalance in sex ratio, is another outcome of that. The disgrace of this is not felt strongly enough. The report also raises a question. Is the calculation correct? Can it have taken into account the thousands of newborn girls quietly killed at birth?

Sep 03
Stress, Strenuous Lifestyle Spikes IVF Supplication
There was a time when In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF) used to be immensely admired by middle-aged women for resolving issues related to pregnancy.

However, the world is advancing rapidly, and at present, young women from urban backgrounds, who are not able to envisage because of an ultra-traumatic daily life, late marriages and long-working hours are slowly but steadily turning back on In-Vitro Fertilization (IVF).

Expressing her opinion related to the contrast in preference for IVF, Indira Ganeshan, gynecologist specializing in IVF, said that the IVF was mostly used by patients between 38 and 45 years of age. But, since last seven years or so, there is a gradual and noticeable budge in the age group of women opting for IVF treatment.

IVF is a medical progression to fertilize egg cells using sperm. The most imperative thing is that the amalgamation is conducted outside the human body.

Hormonal injections are used in order to enhance the efficiency of the eggs. The eggs are later detached from ovaries, and are processed with sperm for the process of fertilization, carried out inside a regulated and cultured milieu.

During the final phase of treatment, the fertilized egg is relocated into patient's uterus so as to establish a booming and fruitful pregnancy.

The treatment method is gaining popularity rapidly. At present, nearly 70% patients are between 23 and 32 years of age, though the tendency is noticeable merely in urban locations, said Dr. Indira.

Browse Archive