World's first medical networking and resource portal

Community Weblogs

Nov19

CINICAL EVALUATION IS AS GOOD AS NON INVASIVE TEST FOR ACUTE CHEST PAIN IN EMERGENCY


Prof Dr,DRAM,HIV /AIDS,HEPATITIS ,SEX DISEASES & WEAKNESS expert,New Delhi,India, +917838059592


Patients experiencing chest pain often undergo imaging  as CT Angiography and stress echocardiography  tests that do not change treatment decisions, even when clinical examination with a simple Electro Cardiogram determines low risk of a cardiac event, according to a secondary finding from a retrospective analysis of the Rule Out Myocardial Ischemia/Infarction by Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT-II) trial, presented at the 2017 Annual Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA).

         The only effects of noninvasive additional testing are prolonging a patient’s stay at the hospital and exposing patients to more ionising radiation, commented presenter David Brown, MD, Washington University.In the ROMICAT-II trial, investigators randomised 1,000 patients with acute chest pain into 2 groups that would receive either coronary computed tomography (CT) or stress testing to rule out a coronary event. In all, 118 patients decided not to have either test, and dropped out of the trial.

        Dr. Brown and colleagues examined the drop-out group compared with the 882 patients who had additional testing, and found no differences in mortality between the groups (i.e., no deaths in either group). There also was no difference in the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the month following the index visit to the emergency department. The investigators found no difference in the need for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and no difference in return trips to the emergency department in the next month. Finally, there was no difference in major acute cardiac events.

The hospital length of stay was 20.3 hours for patients who received no additional testing after an initial clinical evaluation compared with 27.9 hours for patients who received the extra testing. There was a greater cost for those patients who were tested, as well .

Patients who have the tests performed receive about 9.9 mSv of radiation more than patients discharged based on clinical evaluation, Dr. Brown noted.Lack of testing was associated with a lower rate of diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome) and less coronary angiography and PCI during the index visit.



Comments (0)  |   Category (General)  |   Views (95)

Community Comments
User Rating
Rate It


Post your comments

 
Browse Archive